A 24-channel Geode seismograph connected to a spread of 4.5 Hz low-frequency geophones is the standard acquisition system we deploy across Wellington's suburban ridges and reclaimed flatlands. The array captures surface-wave dispersion across a frequency band that resolves shear wave velocity from the near-surface weathered greywacke down to the 30-metre reference depth required by NZS 1170.5:2004. Processing uses a solid frequency-wavenumber transform that handles the steep velocity gradients common at the interface between Port Nicholson reclamation fill and the underlying Wellington Alluvium. For sites on the Thorndon side where wind noise contaminates passive records, we shift to an active-source setup with a 10 kg sledgehammer and stacked impacts, ensuring the dispersion curve remains coherent enough to invert into a reliable one-dimensional VS profile without resorting to assumptions that would mask thin low-velocity layers.
A VS30 value derived from surface waves without a near-surface borehole tie is just a smooth model—it can miss the 3-metre peat lens that doubles the site period.
Common questions
How much does a MASW survey for VS30 cost on a standard Wellington residential section?
For a typical 400–600 m² section with 2 to 3 spreads, the cost ranges from NZ$2,780 to NZ$5,900 depending on access, the number of lines, and whether passive (ambient) recording is required to supplement the active-source data on deeper soil profiles.
Can MASW work on steep Wellington hillside sites where the terrain is over 20 degrees?
Yes, but with modifications. On slopes exceeding 15 degrees we shorten the array to 12 channels at 1.5-metre spacing to maintain straight-line geometry, and we apply a topographic correction to the dispersion analysis. The geophones must be planted perpendicular to the slope face with careful coupling into the colluvium, and we avoid days with saturated ground after heavy Wellington rain to prevent poor sensor coupling.
How does VS30 from MASW compare to a downhole seismic test in a borehole?
MASW measures the average shear wave velocity over the array length, while a downhole test measures it point-location at the borehole. On laterally uniform Wellington alluvium the two methods typically agree within 10–15%. On sites with sharp lateral changes—like the boundary between reclamation and natural ground near the waterfront—MASW spatially averages while the downhole test captures only the local column, so we recommend running two orthogonal MASW spreads to identify any anisotropy before relying on a single VS30 value.